Claudio Ortolina
41 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: ML-92
|
|
title: Heavy duplication in ScrobbleRules context (819 lines)
|
|
status: Done
|
|
assignee: []
|
|
created_date: "2026-04-20 08:57"
|
|
labels: []
|
|
dependencies: []
|
|
references:
|
|
- "https://github.com/cloud8421/music_library/issues/82"
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
<!-- SECTION:DESCRIPTION:BEGIN -->
|
|
|
|
_GitHub: created 2026-02-17 · updated 2026-03-02 · closed 2026-03-02_
|
|
|
|
## Priority: Medium
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`lib/music_library/scrobble_rules.ex` — The following function pairs share near-identical implementations with the only difference being whether they filter by tracks:
|
|
|
|
- `apply_all_album_rules/1` (398-432) vs `apply_all_album_rules/2` (449-490)
|
|
- `apply_all_artist_rules/1` (504-540) vs `apply_all_artist_rules/2` (557-598)
|
|
- `apply_all_rules/0` (613-657) vs `apply_all_rules/1` (678-718)
|
|
|
|
Similarly, `apply_album_rule/1` vs `/2` and `apply_artist_rule/1` vs `/2` share the same SQL-building logic.
|
|
|
|
## Expected behavior
|
|
|
|
Consolidate with optional track-filtering parameters to reduce duplication.
|
|
|
|
## Source
|
|
|
|
From technical debt audit (2026-02-17), item #9.
|
|
|
|
<!-- SECTION:DESCRIPTION:END -->
|